![]() ![]() Meal Planning Guide 2000 Calorie This Meal Planning Guide is based on the Exchange System.Intermittent Diet - 2. Dear, visitor. My name is Vit and this is my intermittent fasting manual called “Intermittent Diet” that will help you understand why short- term fasts are so effective fat loss tool and how you can use them in real life. TABLE OF CONTENTS: Preface. Big Leap or Small Steps? Misconceptions Related to Fasting & Dieting. Intermittent Fasting and Metabolism Frequent Meals and Weight loss Calorie Restriction and Muscles. What is Intermittent Diet? The theory The benefits The difference. The First Phase: Period of Not- Eating– How to Schedule Your Fasts– What to Drink While Fasting. The Second Phase: Period of Eating. How to Track Your Results. Further Reading. New Blog Posts: Redefining the Role of the Binge. Preface. First of all, I would like to say a few words about myself, and what the Intermittent Diet is all about. ![]() My name is Will Hinotsky, and I wrote this manual to help people understand how they can easily simplify and, at the same time, maximize their weight loss by using the method of structured intermittent dieting. The path I took toward writing Intermittent Diet was not typical for a diet author. First of all, I’m a guy who studied mathematics and statistics at a university for four years. This was a great time in my intellectual life, during which I realized that math is not just about figures and equations. After some training, you begin to develop a mathematical way of seeing the world. Learn everything there's to know about the 800 calories diet. Does the 800 calories diet work? This has been a sticking point for me too Kate, as the fat section of the book seems to be the only one without specific amounts per day. The diet is described as a. Don't just sit there scratching your head, find useful info on Nutrition on eHow. Get essential tips and learn more about everything from Best High Fiber Foods (to. If you want to stay healthy and maintain a fit body, you have to add a little more of vegetables to your diet. Vegetables have fewer calories, low fat and are high in. There is a moment when math becomes not just your discipline; it becomes a way of thinking. The first time I had any experience in the dieting world was when my girlfriend told me she wanted to try a low carb diet plan. I wanted to be sure she was trying something that would be safe for her health, so I decided to do some research. Before this time, diet talk for me was similar to fashion talk. I had never given any deep thought to dieting. I started reading popular fitness magazines, blogs, and forums, and, after a while, the topic of dieting caught my interest. I continued by studying books on weight loss, nutrition, and biochemistry, as well as consulting several diet experts. Since I was initially trained to work with quantitative data, I also collected data from different experimental weight loss studies to figure out what models could fit their findings. My new goal was to find out whether there were any concepts that constantly proved their long- term effectiveness. The first important piece of information I found was that caloric restriction, even without specific food restrictions, is necessary for effective weight loss. Another interesting finding was the importance of simplicity in a dieting process. A calorie- restricted but complicated diet has been proven to work short- term only. Probably the most astonishing discovery was that, by default, there are two different phases of human metabolism: fed and fasted. The fasted metabolic state promotes a great fat burning effect, however almost 9. All these principles apply to the Intermittent Diet, making it the universal diet solution. This means you can lose weight and prevent weight gain by following only the Intermittent Diet manual. Or, if you currently enjoy some type of diet plan but find that it brings you limited results, then the Intermittent Diet is still for you. It can be a great complement to or even a critical missing link in your fat loss nutrition program. Big Leap or Small Steps? I want to begin this manual by presenting a model which shows why it is more feasible to lose weight by dieting intermittently than it is to lose weight with traditional dieting. First of all, I’m going to uncover the link between weight loss rate and dieting to see how it can be applied in diet design. In order to do that, we need to conduct the following experiment: Let’s randomly select a huge group (over 1. We won’t be specific, and we’ll allow our imaginary participants to choose between lots of diet plans in existence: low fat, low carb, high protein, vegetarian, or whatever they want. For simplicity. After all, each person is unique, with his or her own personal characteristics and lifestyles. In reality, though, the range of our results will be narrow, if we consider that body weight (like height, life span, bone density, etc.) is a biological variable. And when scientists need to predict values of biological variables, all they need to know is their average value. Then they get their results by using the law of normal distribution. The law of normal distribution. To illustrate it, I will use human height. The law simply says that if one man in six has a height above 1. The tallest person on the planet has a height of 2. Applying the same law and assuming the average rate of fat loss per week is 1 pound, we will get the results for our experiment. I will skip all technical details and formulas, and present the final outcomes only. Chances of losing a certain amount of body weight per week under the terms of our experiment: You can see how irregularly weight loss rates are distributed throughout our population. Chances to lose weight within a given range drops off very quickly as you get away from the average 1 pound. In our experiment, weight loss chances decrease by about 1. What most of our participants should expect from dieting is a weight loss of somewhere between 0 – 3 pounds per week. Note, that weight loss rates tend to slow down as fat mass levels decrease. After losing a significant amount of weight during the first months of your body transformation journey, you will not likely continue losing 1- 2 pounds a week during the following months. Weight loss may slow down to 0. This rate may appear relatively slow to you, but it is quite acceptable for the purpose of body transformation, since it is obvious you don’t need to lose 1,0. Consider also that forcing weight loss to happen faster than it should may have some undesirable consequences. In fact, if you’re trying to lose weight too fast, you have a risk of developing health disorders, such as gallstones. Another concern is that losing weight too fast may result not only in fat loss, but in muscle loss as well. It is becoming clear now that it is highly impossible to lose all your excess weight in one day, regardless of how hard you try. Your total weight loss will be a result of the sum of your collective efforts, not of a single effort or a few efforts. In other words, you are more likely to achieve your goal by taking a number of small steps rather than trying to commit one big leap. The same is applied to dieting. One week of dieting does not make your body super lean – just a bit leaner, although months of dieting are more likely to do that. To be fair, this rule works in both directions. Weight gain doesn’t happen in one day. Overeating on one given day adds only a small percent to total weight gain. So, if TOTAL weight loss takes an EXTENDED period of time to happen, and if a small part of that period contributes only a small amount of weight loss, then we can describe the weight loss process with the following line: The distance between any two dots on the above trend is one week, and since each week is associated with a mild reduction in body weight, the whole trend is also gradually descending. I think this trend model helps to explain why even small but long- term changes in eating habits and physical activity, or what people usually refer to as lifestyle changes, eventually outperform radical but short- term solutions and can lead to lasting results. If we take into account that weight loss is a result of calorie restriction, we can build a similar decreasing trend for total calorie deficit during a dieting period. That’s because calorie intake, like rate of weight loss, is also a non- scalable variable, meaning you can’t eat or burn your monthly norm of calories in just one day. Under our models, it becomes clear that losing weight doesn’t necessarily require constant dieting. The only thing needed is to be in a calorie deficit over the course of some period of time. And this is exactly how intermittent fasting works. For most days out of a week, you will not be in a calorie deficit, but for one or two days, you will be in an extreme calorie deficit. As a result, over the course of a week, your food intake on average will drop, making it possible to lose weight. It makes a lot of sense, however part- time dieting is still not fully recognized in the fitness world, mainly because it involves short- term periods of not eating. This is something we are going to discuss next. Misconceptions Related to Fasting and Dieting. I bet you’ve often heard or read the claims that not eating enough food will actually cause you to store more fat. This argument is the so- called “Starvation Mode” theory (a non- scientific term, by the way). According to this theory, two negative effects are caused by low- calorie dieting: 1) Eating too few calories will slow down your metabolism. As a result, you end up burning fewer calories, and your weight loss slows down to a very minimal rate. Your body starts to utilize muscle for fuel instead of stored fat, and this leads to a decrease in muscle mass. Based on these two points, some experts recommend that you avoid cutting calories too aggressively and advise that you keep eating in order to increase your metabolism and maintain muscle mass. These seem to be central points in promoting daily- calorie restricted diets which instruct you to reduce only a small part of your food intake on a daily basis. In order to detect the real effect of low- calorie dieting on metabolism and muscle, we have to have a bit of basic knowledge. Metabolism, or, more specifically, metabolic rate is a topic that seems to produce a lot of speculation in the weight loss area, so first let’s visit it. Using Reverse Dieting to Create a Potent, Fat- Burning Metabolism. Reverse dieting is the single greatest way to restore your metabolism to its fullest potential. Below you will find everything you need for incorporating reverse dieting into your nutrition program so that you can prime your metabolism for long- term fat loss. Why Should You Be Reverse Dieting? Tell me if this sounds like you: You’ve been trying to lose weight for a while now, and the weight loss starts off going really well. Eventually though, it slows down or stops altogether. So you decide to cut your calories further or do more cardio, and while that works for a little while, your progress plateaus yet again. This cycle is repeated until you are likely eating an absurdly low amount of calories and doing quite a bit of cardio. You probably feel worn down, hungry, achy, and have little energy in the gym. Both your workout progress and weight loss have stalled. The thought of cutting calories even further sounds like a nightmare. But you still have quite a bit of weight to lose. None of this makes sense to you because eating less and exercising more is supposed to result in weight loss. So then, why is all this hard work not getting you results? At the end of the article I’m going to give you a checklist to help you implement reverse dieting for your own situation. Keep an eye out for that. The Case for Reverse Dieting. The reason for your stalled progress is quite simple, actually. When you cut calories, however small your deficit might be, your metabolism begins to down- regulate. In an effort to conserve its energy for survival, your body begins to manufacture less metabolism- friendly hormones like thyroid, testosterone, and leptin so that your body can reach homeostasis. For a simple picture of how this happens, take a 5. This is supposed to result in about a pound of weight loss per week. But that is not going to happen forever, or you would obviously wilt to nothing. Along the way in the weight loss process your body begins to slow down its metabolism to conserve valuable energy (fat, glycogen). Eat at that original 5. Reverse dieting helps you restore your metabolism to a much higher level so that you have a better “base” to cut calories from. Starting your weight loss at 2. The former will result in slower, yet more sustained weight loss over time. The latter will likely result in fast weight loss, quickly followed by stagnation, frustration, and then a falling into the yo- yo dieting trap. How to Reverse Diet. The idea is simple and the name explains it all. What you do is slowly start adding calories back into your diet. I would recommend adding in about 5% more calories on a weekly basis. This equates to about 5. Many people immediately cringe at the thought of adding calories into their weight loss diet. They are flat out afraid of putting on weight. These people are usually the ones who are already eating very low calories, and the concept of reverse dieting (eating more to lose more) just doesn’t “click” with them. But let me tell you what you can expect, and this comes from my own personal experience as well as seeing hundreds of other people implement reverse dieting into their own nutrition. You immediately notice a boost in energy. Your motivation returns and you start looking forward to your workouts again. Your hunger decreases, and all the feelings of extreme restriction start to moderate. Your weight, surprisingly, starts to slowly decrease again – completely flying in the face of all logic. You feel warmer as you stoke your metabolic flame, and your sleep quality greatly improves. You seem to handle stress better, your mental well- being is improved, and life in general just seems a little easier to handle. Sounds pretty great, huh? The problem is that most people don’t have the patience or the courage to give reverse dieting a try. They fear weight gain and they want their results to keep moving forward. Adding calories into their diet seems to go against their goals. However, time and time again I have seen people add calories back into their diet only to see their weight loss pick right back up again. It’s one of the most exciting moments in a dieter’s life when he eats more and sees the scale tick downward. You too could share in this excitement. More Thoughts on Reverse Dieting. You likely have many questions about implementing reverse dieting, and I’ll be more than happy to answer your questions in the comment section, but before I end this article, I want to touch on a few of the intricacies of reverse dieting. Reverse dieting is a slow and methodical process. You must be patient, and you must understand that weight and fat are not always one- in- the- same. Extra calories can result in modest weight gain, but you are not going to gain fat eating under your maintenance calories. Instead, this added weight gain, if any, will be intracellular water retention – otherwise known as muscle glycogen. This is good weight. It is fuel for your muscles. It will boost your energy in the gym and help increase your strength, and it will make your muscles feel fuller. If there is an increase in weight, it usually happens the first couple of days after increasing your calories and then levels off and starts decreasing again towards the end of the week. Weigh yourself, but pay closer attention to the way you look and feel. I recommend you continue with the reverse dieting process for as long as you can handle it. Continue adding in calories (5% per week) until you notice a true weight gain over two weeks. When you finally get to that point, you will have found your true maintenance calories. You will be shocked at just how high you can go. From there, you can cut your calories by 1. One that will provide you with a great high base to cut calories from so that you can achieve sustainable long- term weight loss. Sounds pretty good, doesn’t it? Why not give reverse dieting a try? You really have nothing to lose and everything to gain. Why not take it one step at a time and just try adding in 1. I think you’ll be surprised with the results! If you’re ready to give it a try I’ve created a 4- step checklist to ensure you’re getting started right. It will walk you through the entire reverse dieting process and will let you know when and how much you should increase your calories in order to optimize your metabolism. You can download that checklist right here. Calories in Whole Milk (3. How To Lose Fat - The TRUTH About Fat Loss & Losing Body Fat. There’s a million reasons why people fail to lose fat, but somewhere at the top of that list is just a fundamental lack of understanding of the scientifically proven principles. But, in and of themselves, not a single thing on that list actually causes fat to be lost. They never have, and they never will. In fact, not a single one of these things actually needs to be done. You can do the complete opposite of every item on that list and still lose fat just fine so long as one specific thing IS being done. So, what is this “thing?” What actually causes fat loss? That is the scientifically proven “secret” to losing fat. It literally can’t happen any other way. So just what is a caloric deficit? It’s what happens when you burn more calories than you consume (or consume less calories than you burn. This is the amount of calories that your body requires each day to burn for energy to perform all of the tasks it needs to perform. From intense exercise like cardio and weight training, to simple daily tasks like brushing your teeth and getting dressed, to the various physiological functions needed to keep you alive (like digesting and breathing). Calories are what our bodies use for energy to do all of these things, and we provide these calories via the foods we eat. As a result, 3 things can happen. Our weight will be maintained because all of the calories we needed were provided. No more, no less. If we exceed this amount and therefore consume MORE calories than our bodies need, all of the left over calories that weren’t burned will then be stored on our body in some form for later use. And guess what form it’s most often stored in? This is known as a caloric surplus, and it is the one and only cause of fat gain. But what we’re interested in is the opposite of this. This is what happens when we consume LESS than our maintenance level amount. What happens then is that our bodies are forced to find some other source of energy to burn instead. And guess what that source most often is? And this is the one and only cause of fat loss. So if you maintain your current weight eating 2. However, you would lose weight (mostly in the form of body fat) if you consumed 2. This all remains true regardless of what the source of those calories are (carbs, fat, protein, healthy, unhealthy, clean, dirty, processed, unprocessed? These are the proven fundamentals of how to lose fat, and that was a simple example of how to create the required caloric deficit via your diet alone (by eating less calories). I mention this because that same deficit could have also been created via exercise (by burning more calories). Meaning, you could have still eaten 2. Both scenarios would effectively cause fat loss, as would a third scenario where you did a combination of both (diet AND exercise). But no matter which way you choose to do it, one absolute requirement ALWAYS stands. In order to lose fat, you MUST create a caloric deficit. Nothing else works. But Then How Do Other Fat Loss Diets Work? This is the point when various stubborn, misinformed or just annoyingly stupid people like to mention that other diets cause people to lose fat all the time, and those diets have nothing to do with creating a caloric deficit. I mean, people lose fat on low carb diets, low fat diets, paleo diets, vegan diets, raw food diets, diets that involve eating “clean” instead of “dirty” or not eating after a certain time at night, and countless other types of diets that involve every gimmick, fad and method you can think of except the specific task of creating a caloric deficit. But yet, they have all caused people to successfully lose fat. What the hell? If the only requirement for fat loss is a caloric deficit, and all of these diets have nothing to do with a caloric deficit, then how do they work? Obviously I must be wrong about all this calorie stuff, right? Wrong. You see, all of these diets and methods just indirectly cause you to create that caloric deficit. What I mean is, any diet that actually causes you to lose fat did so because it caused you to create a caloric deficit. There is literally NOTHING else that could possibly make it happen. This is the most basic proven science of the human body. Calories in vs calories out (aka the law of thermodynamics) is ALWAYS the basis for fat loss (or gain). These diets and methods might never come right out and admit that or say you just need to eat less calories (partly because it doesn’t fit with their gimmick, partly because people don’t want to hear that they have to . By getting you to do things that just so happen to restrict or reduce your calorie intake. In every single case, less calories end up being eaten. And like magic, it causes you to lose fat. But what some people incorrectly think is that it was the reduction in carbs, or fat, or grains, or sugar, or junk food, or processed food, or not eating after 7pm or whatever else that made it happen. It wasn’t. It was the reduction in calories that indirectly came as a result of all of these other things. Sure, these “things” are what caused the deficit to be created, but the deficit itself is what actually caused you to lose fat. And that’s how various fat loss diets/methods work despite not directly making you eat less calories. They just get you to do things that make you eat less calories anyway. There’s A Ton Of Ways To Create Your Deficit. If any of these or other manners of eating appeal to you for whatever reason, then I’m all for you using it to reach your fat loss goals. But if you’d rather just directly create your ideal caloric deficit and then get the calories you do consume from a nice balance of protein, fat and carbs comprised solely of foods you actually enjoy eating in a format that is actually convenient and preferable for you, then that’s fine by me too. In fact, it’s what I personally do and most often recommend. I explain exactly how to do it (for FREE) right here: The Best Diet Plan. The point I’m making however is that in every single case with every other diet or method, the reason it works is simply because a caloric deficit was present. And if it didn’t work, then it’s simply because a caloric deficit wasn’t present. There is no other magic or voodoo involved in the actual cause (or lack thereof) of fat loss. It always comes down to calories in vs calories out. But wait, what’s that? You think I’m making this all up? You think this is just my opinion or gimmick? If for whatever reason you still aren’t convinced that what I’m saying is true and accurate (likely as a result of years of nutritional brainwashing), then allow me to present some additional proof. Still Don’t Believe Me? The only difference between the diets of the two groups is that 4. Despite one group eating a VERY high sugar diet and the other group eating a VERY low sugar diet, they both lost equal amounts of weight and body fat. Because it’s NOT the source of your calories that causes fat loss, it’s the presence of a caloric deficit. Increased meal frequency does not promote greater weight loss . They then had each person in each group create the same sized caloric deficit and then consume that same calorie intake every day for 8 weeks. HOWEVER, they had one group eat 3 meals a day, and the other group eat 6 meals a day. They all lost the same amount of weight. In fact, the study showed that there was no difference at all in fat loss, appetite control, or anything similar. Because meal frequency doesn’t affect your ability to lose fat or gain fat. Calories do. Comparison of isocaloric very low carbohydrate/high saturated fat and high carbohydrate . They then divided them up into 3 groups. The first had only 4% of their total daily calorie intake coming from carbs. The second had 5. The third had 7. 0% of their total calorie intake coming from carbs. Even though some people were eating a VERY LOW carb diet and others were eating a VERY HIGH carb diet. Because low carb or high carb isn’t what makes us gain or lose fat. Calories are, regardless of how many of them come from carbs. Similar weight loss with low- energy food combining or balanced diets. This study divided 5. HOWEVER, one group was given a more balanced diet comprised of meals that contained protein, fat and carbs, while the second group had their carb and fat calories separated so they were not eaten together in the same meal. They all lost the same amount of weightand body fat. Because the manner in which you combine foods, organize your meals and consume your daily calories isn’t what causes fat loss. A caloric deficit is. Fat loss depends on energy deficit only, independently of the method for weight loss. This study divided its subjects up into 2 groups, and had them both create the same sized caloric deficit. HOWEVER, the difference between them was the manner in which this deficit was created. One group did it by eating less total calories (diet alone), but the other group did it by eating less total calories AND burning more calories by doing cardio (a combination of diet AND exercise). But again, the total weekly caloric deficit was the same for both groups. They all lost the same amount of weight and body fat. Because a deficit of X calories is a deficit of X calories regardless of whether you burned those calories off via cardio or just didn’t eat them in the first place. Fat loss isn’t about how you create the deficit, it’s just about the deficit itself. The Twinkie Diet. You know what? This one is so F- ing fantastic that a quick bullet point just doesn’t do it justice. Twinkies, Little Debbie cakes, Doritos, Oreos, sugary cereals like Corn Pops and other equally crappy foods that are all highly processed, lacking in nutritional value, loaded with sugar and “bad” carbs, high in “bad” fat, contain trans fat, and possess other similar traits that are common among typical “junk food.”But, he also created a caloric deficit. He went from eating 2. He just so happened to get the majority of those 1.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
June 2017
Categories |